There is a radical incompatibility between sport and violence,

253

Any form of violence, including verbal or other more subtle, based on cheating, deceit and contempt for fair play. For decades, this central idea has guided the work that the European Union and its institutions, the competent public authorities in matters of sport in each of its member countries, as well as the International Olympic Committee and the different organizations have been carrying out in concert. that make up the international sports system. The central objective that unites the diversified action of such a wide spectrum of public and private actors is to eradicate violence in sport, in addition to preventing, controlling and rigorously punishing any violent manifestation in the field of sports activity,

Despite this and in a broad sense,

 Violence consists of applying force to the environment. For this reason, sport always and to a different extent entails violence, as the use of force, which is applied either to the elements (land, water and air), or to people who become adversaries in the sporting field. Violence in sport, applied in accordance with its rules, is an authorized application of force. On the contrary, if the force is applied in contravention of the sporting rules, it constitutes an infraction or an illegal aggression. Thus, it is the world of sport itself that, by establishing its rules in each modality, determines the acceptable level of violence and when this application of force is inadmissible because it is contrary to sports regulations. In this ambit,

 Due to the very attraction generated by the phenomenon of violence. This, for these reasons, often has a great impact on the media, which, on occasions, reproduce violent incidents ad nauseam, whether in word or in fact. This presence of 해외축구중계 violence in the media tarnishes, if not calls into question or contradicts, the intrinsic values ​​of sport as an ethical and behavioral reference.

The reality of violence in sport and its impact on the media is a reflection of the clear social permissiveness of violence, permissiveness that feeds back with the intervention of all agents in the sports environment on the initial basis of regulatory application or not of force in sport and of the encounter between adversaries, be they athletes, technicians or leaders.

Thus, the phenomenon of violence in sport

 in our society is a complex phenomenon that goes beyond the sports field itself and forces public institutions to adopt measures that promote prevention and influence the control, if not the punishment, of violent behavior . Proper management of violence entails a global approach, based on fundamental rights and freedoms, the limitation of risk and that of goods and people. On these principles, apart from promoting adequate management and self-regulation by the world of sport itself, public institutions must provide the world of sport with the appropriate legal framework that allows the prosecution of damages and aggressions, the attribution of the corresponding civil responsibilities and the adoption of security measures.

Violence in sport is, moreover, an apprenticeship that begins in the lower categories, directly influencing the process of child and youth education. A global approach against the phenomenon of violence in sport also entails cooperation between all public administrations and respect for the scope of their specific powers, insofar as the treatment of this phenomenon involves the concurrence of various administrations, both in the sports as well as security and public shows.

Likewise, the concern to promote the social dimension

of sport as an educator in values ​​is also part of the common European acquis when it comes to promoting joint initiatives by public authorities and sports organizations to make sport a school of life and of tolerance, especially in childhood, adolescence and for young people, that educates and not deforms.